Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 PA 543 - Abel v. Abel

Abel v. Abel’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 1961
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1961

10 state decisions

701902191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grim's Appeal · Baskin's Appeal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Nothing less than express devise or necessary implication will exclude an heir. Where the meaning of a devise is uncertain the law will adhere as closely as possible to the general rules of inheritance and whosoever claims against the law of descent must show a satisfactory written title.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.