Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

201 So. 2d 779

Bostwick v. Bostwick

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 16, 1967

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1967-08-16

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1967-08-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 1995

6 state decisions

301967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This is an interlocutory appeal from an order requiring the appellant (plaintiff) to pay temporary attorneys’ fees and costs in a divorce action.

¶2The primary thrust of plaintiff’s appeal deals with the assertion that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding temporary attorneys’ fees and costs.

¶3A determination of plaintiff’s contention requires an examination of the testimony and evidence considered by the trial court on which the order was based. The order appealed was entered after two separate hearings. The first hearing was not steno-graphically recorded and consequently was not included in appellant’s appendix. F. A.R. 4.2, subd. d, 31 F.S.A.

¶4It is incumbent upon 'the appellant to bring to the appellate court the record necessary for a determination of the appeal. The record in the case sub judice is *780insufficient for a determination of plaintiff’s contention.

¶5Affirmed.

ANDREWS and CROSS, JJ., and COOPER, RICHARD H., Associate Judge, concur.
/201/so2d/779 · .json · Public domain