Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 SW2D 636 - Vehle v. Wagner

Vehle v. Wagner’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 1987
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1987

4 state decisions

2019461950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rosenborough v. Cook · Hexter v. Pratt · Grace v. Wade & Mains · Kinard v. Sims

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In order for plaintiffs to recover as stockholders of B-R Ranch Royalties corporation, it must be that B-R Ranch Royalties corporation would be entitled to recover. The rights asserted by a stockholder are derivative.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.