Garcia v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio))
Relationships
Relies on Montgomery v. State · Guzman v. State · Dowthitt v. State · Burnett v. State · Arcila v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In all prosecutions for murder, the state or the defendant shall be permitted to offer testimony as to all relevant facts and circumstances surrounding the killing and the previous relationship existing between the accused and the deceased, together with all relevant facts and circumstances going to show the condition of the mind of the accused at the time of the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mario Gomez v. State“did not put intent at issue through means such as presentation of defense theories or vigorous cross-examination,” the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Garcia v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.