Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 SW3D 765 - Wright v. State

Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland))

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. State · Camacho v. State · Melton v. State · Seals v. State · Dowling v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he State has to prove only that the aggregate weight of the controlled substance mixture, including adulterants and dilutants, equals the alleged minimum weight.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.