Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

201 U.S. 244

50 L. Ed. 742

Docket Nos. 192, 193, 195.

Peter Frenzer v. Sumner Wallace

Full caption · 3 consolidated cases

  • PETER FRENZER et al., Apptsv.SUMNER WALLACE et al. NO 192. EDGAR M
  • MORSMAN, Apptv.SUMNER WALLACE et al. NO 193. GEORGE W
  • McCLELLAN, as Executor, etc., et al., Apptsv.SUMNER WALLACE et al. NO 195

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 1906

Submitted March 6, 1906.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1906-04-02

<p>Decided on authority of Wyman v. Wallace, ante, p. 230.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1906

2 counsel of record

Relies on State of Wisconsin v. Ethan Allen Hitchcock

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · 9–0 · Decided 1906-04-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Westel W. Morsman and Howard B. Smith for appellants in No. 192, and Mr. Westel W. Morsman for appellant in No. 193.

Messrs. Richard S. Horton and Charles Battelle for appellants in No. 195.

Messrs. James M. Woolworth and R. S. Hall for appellees.

Per Mr. Justice Brewer:

¶1

These are separate appeals by other stockholders from the same decree, and present no questions other than those considered in the former opinion, and the same decrees of affirmance will be entered.

/201/us/244 · .json · Public domain