Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 U.S. 378 - McCahan Sugar Refining Company v. The Steamship Wildcroft

McCahan Sugar Refining Company v. The Steamship Wildcroft’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
April 1989
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1989 · most notably La Bourgogne (1908), George Deslions v. La Compagnie Generale Transatlantique

5 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

90190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Third Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on International Navigation Company v. Farr Bailey Manufacturing Company · The Carib Prince · Joseph Martin v. Steamship Southwark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the ship was seaworthy in all respects at the beginning of the voyage, and it was a careless and recent opening of the valve or valves, shortly before the fresh water was let in, which resulted in the damage complained of.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.