Ware v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2001
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Olmstead v. United States · People v. Mayen · Imboden v. People · Smith v. Merrill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The common-law rule is that the admissibility of evidence is not affected by the illegality of the means by which it was obtained. . . .Nor can we . . . subscribe to the suggestion that the courts have a discretion to exclude evidence, the admission of which is not unconstitutional, because unethically secured.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kidder v. Kidder“[t]he doctrine of the exclusion of evidence illegally obtained should be confined strictly to those cases where the procuring of the evidence has violated some constitutional right of the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Noble
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.