201 Wis. 2d 291 - State v. Achterberg’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2012
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 115 Wis. 2d 334 - State v. Pharr · 109 Wis. 2d 461 - Hedtcke v. Sentry Insurance · 165 Wis. 2d 585 - Burkes v. Hales · 128 Wis. 2d 15 - State v. Nordness · 70 Wis. 2d 760 - Mulvaney v. Tri State Truck & Auto Body, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if it appears that justice does not require the enforcement of the forfeiture.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Melone v. State“opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.