201 Wis. 2d 452 - State v. Elm’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably State v. LaCount (2008), 203 Wis. 2d 66 - State v. Ross (1996)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Boston · 124 Wis. 2d 628 - State v. Pitsch · 120 Wis. 2d 92 - State v. Haseltine · 110 Wis. 2d 485 - State v. Felton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An appellate court will not second-guess a trial attorney's 'considered selection of trial tactics or the exercise of a professional judgment in the face of alternatives that have been weighed by trial counsel.' A strategic trial decision rationally based on the facts and the law will not support a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A strategic trial decision rationally based on the facts and the law will not support a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'[t]estimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise admissible is not objectionable because it embraces an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.