Pratsch v. Pratsch’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 91 Wis. 2d 813 - Boston Old Colony Insurance v. International Rectifier Corp. · State Ex Rel. Gaudynski v. Pruss · 147 Wis. 2d 328 - Douglas v. Dewey · Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Dunbar Kapple, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(2) For papers that do not require a filing fee: (a) A court may adopt a local rule, if it is approved by the chief judge, that requires the use of a plain-paper facsimile machine and permits the filing of those papers by facsimile transmission to the clerk of circuit court. (b) If no rule has been adopted under par. (a), a judge may permit a party or attorney in a specific matter to file those papers with the clerk of circuit court by facsimile transmission to a plain-paper facsimile machine. (c) The party or attorney, by filing papers by facsimile transmission, certifies that permission of the judge or court for filing by facsimile transmission has been granted. Papers filed by facsimile transmission are considered filed when transmitted except that papers filed by facsimile transmission completed after regular business hours of the clerk of court's office are considered filed the next business day.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Sorenson“[a] notice of appeal is a paper that requires the payment of a filing fee. RULE 809.25(2)(a)1. Therefore, § 801.16(2), does not permit the filing of a notice of appeal by facsimile transmission.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Sorenson“plainly means that only those papers that do not require a filing fee may be filed by facsimile transmission.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Sorenson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.