201 Wis. 2d 98 - State v. Vinje’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 172 Wis. 2d 234 - Kelley Co., Inc. v. Marquardt · 41 Wis. 2d 497 - State v. Zwicker · 173 Wis. 2d 222 - State Ex Rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry · 60 Wis. 2d 54 - State v. Elson · 143 Wis. 2d 500 - State v. Connelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f the language of the statute clearly and unambiguously sets forth the legislative intent, it is the duty of the court to apply that intent to the case at hand and not look beyond the statutory language to ascertain its meaning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous, unreasonably loud . . . conduct”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Schwebke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.