State ex rel. State v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2004
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · 172 W. Va. 295 - State v. Williams · 171 W. Va. 342 - State v. Richey · 187 W. Va. 136 - State v. Gill · 172 W. Va. 491 - State v. Zaccagnini
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(2). Mandatory joinder. — If two or more offenses are known or should have been known by the exercise of due diligence to the attorney for the state at the time of the commencement of the prosecution and were committed within the same county having jurisdiction and venue of the offenses, all such offenses upon which the attorney for the state elects to proceed shall be prosecuted by separate counts in a single prosecution if they are based on the same act or transaction or on two or more acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan whether felonies or misdemeanors or both. Any offense required by this rule to be prosecuted by a separate count in a single prosecution cannot be subsequently prosecuted unless waived by the Defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Reed
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.