Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 Ark. App. 250 - Wright v. Wright

2010 Ark. App. 250 - Wright v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 60 Ark. App. 27 - Jennings v. Burford · 76 Ark. App. 150 - Keathley v. Keathley · McKay v. McKay · Davis v. Office of Child Support Enforcement · 27 Ark. App. 250 - Hodges v. Hodges

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 10, Section III(c), for self-employed pay-ors, the circuit court should first consider the last two years’ federal and state income tax returns and the quarterly estimates for the current year. A self-employed payor’s income should include contributions made to retirement plans, alimony paid, and self-employed insurance paid.[ 1 ] Id. Depreciation should be allowed only to the extent that it reflects actual decrease in value of an asset. Id. If the circuit court determines that the tax returns are unreliable, then it shall make specific findings explaining the basis of its determination. The circuit court shall then proceed using the net-worth method. The circuit court shall establish a beginning net worth at the start of the relevant period and an ending net worth at the end of the period, considering living expenses and allowable deductions for the same period. See Holland [v. United States] 348 U.S. at 125, 75 S.Ct. 127 [ 99 L.Ed. 150 (1954) ]. Additionally, the circuit court shall consider the following factors: (1) the impact of inflation or deflation on the payor’s net worth; (2) liquidity of the payor’s assets; (3) the payor’s cash flow; (4) the payor’s current and long-term financial obligations; (5) the pay- or’s lifestyle; and (6) any other relevant factors. After determining the payor’s disposable income, the circuit court shall calculate child support in accordance with the child-support guidelines.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.