Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 ME 118 - State v. Hurd

State v. Hurd’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tanner v. United States · McDonald v. Pless · Richardson v. United States · Pittston Coal Group v. Sebben · United States v. Ford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “inquire[ ] into the jury's deliberative process beyond establishing, to the extent permitted by M.R. Evid. 606(b), that the jury's original verdict ... was not the product of outside influence or external juror misconduct”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “inquire into the validity of a verdict ... [namely,] for serious allegations of juror bias in the context of juror dishonesty or inaccuracy in answering a voir dire questionnaire, for example”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the ban on juror testimony regarding the internal deliberation process of the jury ... is a ban on court consideration of any post-discharge juror communications about such subjects.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.