State v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Allen · In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated · United States v. Brazel · United States v. Beasley · United States v. Stotts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Judges must ascertain whether they, in fact, come within any of the categories requiring disqualification in the Code of Judicial Conduct and whether there is any other basis upon which their impartiality may reasonably be questioned. At the same time judges must not allow litigants to utilize the process of a recu-sal motion to delay or thwart the judicial proceedings where there is no reasonable basis for the motion and it is obvious on its face that it was intended to halt or delay the litigation. A judge is as much obliged not to recuse himself when it is not called for as he is obliged to when it is.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re J.R. Jr.“Error in the citation of a statute or its omission shall not be grounds for the ... reversal of a conviction if the error or omission did not mislead the defendant to the defendant’s prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.