State v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
August 2025
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Whren v. United States · Bumper v. North Carolina · Florida v. Jimeno · United States v. Stults
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether a given consent to a search in a particular case was in fact voluntary or the product of duress, coercion, express or implied, is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of all the surrounding circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“As with other factors bearing on voluntariness, whether a misrepresentation of the purpose of a search by the police invalidates consent is a question of fact based on the totality of the circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“review the factual findings of the motion court to determine whether those findings are supported by the record, and will only set aside those findings if they are clearly erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bailey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.