State v. Berke’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Lance · United States v. Burgess · United States v. Roach · United States v. Damrah · 643 F. Supp. 2d 1133 - In Re Flash Memory Antitrust Litigation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“produce evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item is what the proponent claims it is.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tieman“embodies a flexible approach to authentication reflecting a low burden of proof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tieman“identical to that set forth in the Federal Rules of Evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tieman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.