State v. Strong’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3501
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · McNabb v. United States · State v. Taylor · State v. Beach · City of Billings v. Peterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the requirement for a prompt initial appearance protects the defendant from being jailed and held incommunicado for indefinite ** and possibly protracted periods of time. Closely associated with the requirement of a prompt initial appearance is the requirement that a defendant be informed without unnecessary delay of the important rights set out in § 46-7-102, MCA. These two sections together ensure that a criminal prosecution begins promptly and with a recognition of the defendant's essential rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Norvell“We re-affirm what was at least implied in Gatlin", if a defendant who is not afforded the rights provided by §§ 46-7-101 and -102, MCA, demonstrates material prejudice arising from an unnecessary delay in providing an initial appearance or from failure to provide required information and advisories, then dismissal with prejudice may be warranted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Mark White“unnecessarily delaying a defendant's initial appearance before a judge 'shocks' the concepts of fundamental fairness and due process ... suppression remedy is insufficient”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Norvell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.