Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 MT 175 - State v. James

State v. James’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
May 2020
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Purkett v. Elem

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(1) a defendant's conduct constitutes an offense within the jurisdiction of the court where the first prosecution occurred and within the jurisdiction of the court where the subsequent prosecution is pursued; (2) the first prosecution resulted in an acquittal or a conviction; and (3) the subsequent prosecution is based on an offense arising out of the same transaction [as that term is defined in § 46-1-202(23), MCA]."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"Same transaction" means conduct consisting of a series of acts or omissions that are motivated by: (a) a purpose to accomplish a criminal objective and that are necessary or incidental to the accomplishment of that objective.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “criminal objective—driving at high speed to elude capture—was the same as to each charge”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.