State v. James’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
May 2020
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Purkett v. Elem
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(1) a defendant's conduct constitutes an offense within the jurisdiction of the court where the first prosecution occurred and within the jurisdiction of the court where the subsequent prosecution is pursued; (2) the first prosecution resulted in an acquittal or a conviction; and (3) the subsequent prosecution is based on an offense arising out of the same transaction [as that term is defined in § 46-1-202(23), MCA]."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kopp“"Same transaction" means conduct consisting of a series of acts or omissions that are motivated by: (a) a purpose to accomplish a criminal objective and that are necessary or incidental to the accomplishment of that objective.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“criminal objectivedriving at high speed to elude capturewas the same as to each charge”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kopp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.