State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
54 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · Boyd v. United States · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · Moran v. Burbine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a state of mind in reference to the case or to either of the parties that would prevent the juror from acting with entire impartiality and without prejudice to the substantial rights of either party.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n reality, few people are entirely impartial regarding criminal matters. ...”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'whether society is willing to recognize that subjective expectation [of privacy] as objectively reasonable.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Warren
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.