State v. Ankeny’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
December 2025
most recently cited
33 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Whitlow v. State · Hulse v. State, Department of Justice · State v. Gunderson · State v. Weeks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is to protect victims from harm caused by ... persons whose intimate ... relationship to the victim increases the danger of harm, either because the parties live in physical proximity or because the relationship is one whose intimacy may disable the victim from seeking protection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bates v. State“[T]he authority to grant or deny a motion in limine rests in the inherent power of the court to admit or exclude evidence and to take such precautions as are necessary to afford a fair trial for all parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.