State v. Norman’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
64
cited by 64 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited
2 district · 62 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Cunningham v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) show[s] that the claimed error implicates a fundamental right and (2) ‘firmly convince[s]’ this Court that failure to review the claimed error would result in a manifest miscarriage of justice, leave unsettled the question of the fundamental fairness of the trial or proceedings, or compromise the integrity of the judicial process.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Main · State v. Torres“It is perhaps our most fundamental rule of appellate review that, with rare exception, we will not review an issue or claim that was not property preserved for appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Weik
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.