Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 MT 287 - State v. Lambert

State v. Lambert’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ariegwe · State v. Herman · State v. Guillaume · State v. Heath · State v. Triplett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]triking or vacating illegal conditions of a sentence when they could be corrected on remand could eliminate conditions that support important public policies such as protecting crime victims or rehabilitating the criminal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “remand to the district court to correct the illegal provision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “when a portion of a sentence is illegal,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.