State v. Emil’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Opheim v. County of Norman · Stark v. Heart River Irrigation District · State v. Frank · Sand v. R.J. · State v. Murray
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An appeal may be taken by the state from: [[Image here]] 5. An order granting the return of property or suppressing evidence, or suppressing a confession or admission, when accompanied by a statement of the prosecuting attorney as serting that the appeal is not taken for purpose of delay and that the evidence is a substantial proof of a fact material in the proceeding. The statement must be filed with the clerk of district court and a copy must accompany the notice of appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Peterson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.