Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 ND 117 - State v. Emil

State v. Emil’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Opheim v. County of Norman · Stark v. Heart River Irrigation District · State v. Frank · Sand v. R.J. · State v. Murray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An appeal may be taken by the state from: [[Image here]] 5. An order granting the return of property or suppressing evidence, or suppressing a confession or admission, when accompanied by a statement of the prosecuting attorney as serting that the appeal is not taken for purpose of delay and that the evidence is a substantial proof of a fact material in the proceeding. The statement must be filed with the clerk of district court and a copy must accompany the notice of appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.