¶1Filed 11/9/10 by Clerk of Supreme Court
¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT
¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
¶11State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
¶13v.
¶15Daniel Raymond Szklarski, Defendant and Appellant
¶19No. 20100087
¶23Appeal from the District Court of Walsh County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Richard M Geiger, Judge.
¶25AFFIRMED.
¶27Per Curiam.
¶29Barbara L. Whelan, State’s Attorney, Walsh County Courthouse, 600 Cooper Ave., 3rd Floor, Grafton, N.D. 58237, for plaintiff and appellee.
¶31Darla J. Schuman, Schuman Law Office, 3001-A 32nd Ave. S., Grand Forks, N.D. 58201, for defendant and appellant.
¶33No. 20100087
¶35Per Curiam.
¶36[¶1] Daniel Szklarski appeals from the trial court’s judgment and order revoking his probation. On appeal, Szklarski argues the trial court erred in allowing him to represent himself at the probation revocation hearing because he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
¶37[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
¶38Mary Muehlen Maring
¶39Daniel J. Crothers
¶40Dale V. Sandstrom
¶41Carol Ronning Kapsner