Fleck v. Fleck’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Buchholz v. Buchholz · Berge v. Berge · Jelsing v. Peterson · Van Dyke v. Van Dyke · Machart v. Machart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Child support determinations involve questions of law which are subject to the de novo standard of review, findings of fact which are subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review, and may, in some limited areas, be matters of discretion subject to the abuse of discretion standard of review.’ ” Verhey v. McKenzie, 2009 ND 35, ¶ 5 , 763 N.W.2d 113 (quoting Buchholz v. Buchholz, 1999 ND 36, ¶ 11 , 590 N.W.2d 215 ). “A court errs as a matter of law if it does not comply with the requirements of the child support guidelines.” Doepke v. Doepke, 2009 ND 10, ¶ 6 , 760 N.W.2d 131 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.