Davis v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 407 (§ 207 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Propper v. Clark · Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Board · 341 Pa. Super. 512 - Children & Youth Services of Allegheny County v. Chorgo · Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg · Newman v. Newman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘A payment of children’s benefits made to or on behalf of a child who is not living with tire obligor must be credited as a payment toward the obligor’s child support obligation in the month (or other period) the payment is intended to cover, but may not be credited as a payment toward die child support obligation for any other mondr or period.’ [N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-02(11) (1995)].” 780 N.W.2d at 709 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.