Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 OHIO 5991 - State v. Chappell

State v. Chappell’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration · State v. Hairston · Bailey v. Republic Engineered Steels, Inc. · Niskanen v. Giant Eagle, Inc. · 152 Ohio St. 458 - Couts v. Rose

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the meaning of a statute is unambiguous and definite, it must be applied as written and no further interpretation is necessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a criminal offense shall be construed as referring to existing or former laws of this state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “for violation of such prohibition or failure to meet such duty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.