Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 Ohio 621 - State v. Jackson

State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Colorado v. Connelly · Kastigar v. United States · Hoffman v. United States · Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when a trial court rules after a Kastigar hearing that a prosecutor has used the defendant's compelled statement in preparation for trial after indictment, the appropriate remedy is for the trial court to suppress that statement and all evidence derived from the statement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “the state makes derivative use of a Garrity statement both when the prosecutor presents to the grand jury testimony from a witness to a Garrity statement and when the prosecutor reviews a Garrity statement in preparation for trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he burden is on the state to establish that no use was made of the immunized statement and that the evidence to be used at trial was derived from sources wholly independent of the immunized statement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.