2010 OK CR 22 - State v. Sittingdown’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Leon · Mapp v. Ohio · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Stone v. Powell · Sedillo v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he exclusionary rule is not applied when a law enforcement officer has conducted a search in 'objectively reasonable reliance' upon a search warrant issued by a magistrate and has abided by the terms of the warrant even if the warrant is subsequently determined to be invalid”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. STATE v. MARCUM · STATE v. MARCUM“[T]he 'prime purpose' of the exclusionary rule 'is to deter future unlawful police conduct and thereby effectuate the guarantee of the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. STATE v. KEEFE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.