Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 OKCR 5 - Summers v. State

Summers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Mississippi · California v. Trombetta · Crane v. Kentucky · Holmes v. South Carolina · Simpson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Such a rule, at least when too rigorously applied, would appear to be 'disproportionate' to the (reliability) end that it is intended to promote, since it subjects the defendant's evidence to a more demanding SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 12 (0) 1.947A cisetz admissibility evaluation than it does the State's.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “well-established rules of evidence permit trial judges to exclude evidence if its probative value is outweighed by certain other factors such as unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or potential to mislead the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “fully comport with the later-developed, but now well-established doctrine regarding the defendant's right to a meaningful opportunity to present his defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.