Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 Pa. Super. 10 - Murphy v. Murphy

2010 Pa. Super. 10 - Murphy v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 360 Pa. Super. 16 - Lyday v. Lyday · Stockton v. Stockton · 2002 Pa. Super. 419 - Commonwealth v. Thomas · Hepler v. Urban · 2002 Pa. Super. 310 - Hayward v. Hayward

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the entry of a support order need not contain a Rule 236 docket entry that notice has been sent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.