2010 Pa. Super. 234 - Commonwealth v. Benson’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
December 2013
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. Maryland · Commonwealth v. DeJohn · Commonwealth v. Hamlin · Broussard v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of Pittsburgh · 327 Pa. Super. 253 - Commonwealth v. Beauford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hile Appellant had use of the telephone, the bills in question were not his telephone bills_Appellant had no legal right to request or control access to the information from the telephone company because he was not the owner of the telephone. He had no legitimate expectation of privacy in them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.