Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 Pa. Super. 47 - Commonwealth v. Dent

2010 Pa. Super. 47 - Commonwealth v. Dent’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Two Electronic Poker Game MacHines · People Ex Rel. Ellison v. . Lavin · 2001 Pa. Super. 194 - Commonwealth v. Marti · 1999 Pa. Super. 29 - Commonwealth v. Martin · 79 Wash. 2d 578 - State Ex Rel. Schillberg v. Barnett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “while the outcome of poker may be dependent on skill to some degree, it is predominately a game of chance”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 45 Kan. App. 2d 1043 - THREE KINGS HOLDINGS, LLC v. Six · 49 F. Supp. 3d 751 - Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe
  2. “presents players with different hands, making the players unequal . . . at the turn of a card.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 45 Kan. App. 2d 1043 - THREE KINGS HOLDINGS, LLC v. Six

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.