Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 S.D. 75 - State v. Harris

State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · State v. McGee · State v. Copeland · State v. Smith · Courtney v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court has discretion in the wording and arrangement of its jury instructions and therefore we generally review a trial court’s decision to grant or deny a particular instruction under the abuse of discretion standard. However, no court has discretion to give incorrect, misleading, conflicting, or confusing instructions: to do so constitutes reversible error if it is shown not only that the instructions were erroneous, but also that they were prejudicial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.