Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 SD 91 - State v. Wright

State v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
3
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Ornelas v. United States · Whren v. United States · Adams v. Williams · Delaware v. Prouse

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motion to suppress based on an alleged violation of a constitutionally protected right is a question of law reviewed de novo.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The stop may not be the product of mere whim, caprice or idle euri-osity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Id. (quoting State v. Akuba, 2004 S.D. 94 , ¶ 15, 686 N.W.2d 406, 413 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.