State v. Candedo’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited
35 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kansas v. Hendricks · Chapman v. United States · Jau-Fei Chen v. Stewart · United States v. Angelos · Condemarin v. University Hospital
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“court may correct an illegal sentence, or a sentence imposed in an illegal manner, at any time.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thurman · State v. Dana“ambiguous with respect to the time and manner in which it is to be served, is internally contradictory, omits a term required to be imposed by statute, is uncertain as to the substance of the sentence, or is a sentence which the judgment of conviction did not authorize.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thurman · State v. Jones“[al 'patently' or 'manifestly' illegal sentence [is one] ... (1) where the sentencing court has no jurisdiction, ... (2) where the sentence is beyond the authorized statutory range,”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dana · State v. Houston
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.