Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 UT 34 - State v. Roybal

State v. Roybal’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Arvizu · Alabama v. White · United States v. Hensley · Florida v. JL

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However, 'under certain circumstances the officer may rely on other sources of information' such as 'bulletins[ ] or flyers received from other law enforcement sources,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “any information intended to prompt investigation that is transmitted through police channels, regardless of method”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Reasonable suspicion ... is dependent upon both the content of information possessed by police and its degree of reliability. Both factors-quantity and quality-are considered in the totality of the cireumstances ... that must be taken into account when evaluating whether there is reasonable suspicion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.