State v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Barrett · State v. Andrews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the procedural status of the case and to determine that no direct or collateral attacks on the judgment are pending, that no stays are in effect, and that there are no procedural defects in the warrant application process. 170 '”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gardner v. State“neither a judgment of conviction nor an order that affects the rights of the defendant,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gardner v. State“not permit review of substantive claims that the underlying sentence is invalid. 171 '”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gardner v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.