Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 UT 67 - Jensen v. Young

Jensen v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 11 Cal. 4th 583 - Adams v. Paul · 301 Ill. App. 3d 349 - Lucey v. Law Offices of Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered · Warren v. Provo City Corp. · Jensen v. Sawyers · Spears v. Warr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The applicability of a statute of limitations and the applicability of the discovery rule are questions of law, which we review for correctness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The limitations period for a legal malpractice claim is four years.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) in situations where the discovery rule is mandated by statute; (2) in situations where a plaintiff does not become aware of the cause of action because of the defendant's concealment or misleading conduct; and (3) in situations where the case presents exceptional circumstances and the application of the general rule would be irrational or unjust, regardless of any showing that the defendant has prevented the discovery of the cause of action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.