Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 UT 9 - State v. Tripp

State v. Tripp’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

35 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Brinegar v. United States · Schmerber v. State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he trial court's underlying factual findings are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress is reviewed for correctness, including its application of the law to the facts.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'1) the absence of a claim of authority to search by the officers; 2) the absence of an exhibition of foree by the officers; 3) a mere request to search; 4) cooperation by the [defendant]; and 5) the absence of deception or trick on the part of the officer'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.