2010 UT App 231 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Thomas · State v. Green · 2003 UT App 170 - State v. Sloan · State v. Price
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'An issue is inadequately briefed when the overall analysis of the issue is so lacking as to shift the burden of research and argument to the reviewing court.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Larsen“Briefs that do not comply with the detailed requirements set forth in rule 24(a) [of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure] may be disregarded or stricken.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.