Watkins v. Ford’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daines v. Vincent · Ward v. Intermountain Farmers Ass'n · Jeffs v. Stubbs · Soter's, Inc. v. Deseret Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n · T.M. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. It therefore concluded that Henry Day breached the Contracts by refusing to sell two GTs to Mr. Watkins for MSRP. Id. 116. Next, the court of appeals treated waiver and abandonment as identical legal theories, reasoning that both involve the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Watkins v. Ford“Utah's rules of contract interpretation allow courts to consider any relevant evidence to determine whether a latent ambiguity exists in contract terms that otherwise appear to be [facially] unambiguous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Watkins v. Ford“The] understood that the automobiles that were the subject of [the Contracts were] the yet to be produced Ford GT concept car or the GT4O as it was called at that time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Watkins v. Ford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.