2010 UT App 30 - State v. Verde’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Menzies · State v. Thurman · State v. Shickles · State v. Killpack · In Re Halverson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“under which intent is per se controverted once a defendant pleads not guilty to a specific-intent crime. Id. In light of this holding, the court of appeals did not address the State's alternative argument that the trial court properly admitted the bad acts evidence for the additional purpose of proving Verde's pattern of conduct, preparation, or plan of enticing and exploiting teenage males. Yet the court did recognize”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Verde“{ulnder rule 404(b), evidence of prior bad acts may only be admitted for noncharacter purposes, 'such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Relevant evidence' means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.