2010 UT App 328 - State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Tibbs v. Florida · Purkett v. Elem · Ford v. Georgia · State v. Dunn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When reviewing rulings on hearsay, we review '[lJe-gal questions regarding admissibility ... for correctness, ... questions of fact ... for clear error, and the final 'ruling on admissibility for abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Garrido“Evi-dentiary errors on the part of the trial court will only be reversed if prejudicial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.