State v. Hurt’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · New York v. Belton · Arizona v. Gant · Brendlin v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The State correctly asserts that Hurt's appellate brief fails to even acknowledge the district court's reliance on Hurt's consent, much less present any reasoned argument or authority against it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“A party challenging a fact finding must first marshal all record evidence that supports the challenged finding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Selzer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.