2010 UT App 388 - State v. Otterson’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2022
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc. · State v. Hamilton · State v. Killpack · State v. Kohl · State v. Fulton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Utah appellate courts have long required a showing of harm to warrant reversal in the face of an erroncous evidentiary ruling.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“1 64 Rule 404(b) provides, Evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts is not admissible to show action in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes ... provided that upon request by the accused, the prosecution in a criminal case shall provide reasonable notice in advance of trial, or during trial if the court excuses pretrial notice on good cause shown, of the nature of any such evidence it intends to introduce at trial”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the defendant must petition for an in camera review in which the [district] court will review the records to determine if they actually contain material that is relevant and ought to be disclosed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Peraza
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.