2010 UT App 396 - State v. King’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited
55 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Indelicato v. United States · Bullock v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co. · Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Ben Cooper, Inc. · State v. Dunn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[B]efore we will reverse a conviction based on ineffective assistance of counsel,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jamieson · State v. Wright“if the actions or remarks call to the attention of the jurors matters they would not be justified in considering in determining their verdict.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“reverse only if the cumulative effect of the several errors undermines our confidence”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.