State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
July 2025
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 455
Relies on Bracy v. Gramley · Aetna Life Insurance v. Lavoie · Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc. · Upper Pecos Ass'n v. Peterson · Morningstar v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is not comparable to the claim made in Caperton. Caperton was based on claims of 38 No. 2023AP1399-OA particularized bias against a party in a pending case because of actions taken by the other party. . . . Those actions were alleged to have directly benefitted a justice who at the time was about to decide”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“The reviewing court must objectively decide if the judge went through the required exercise of making a subjective determination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Allen's allegations do not even begin to approach a due process violation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.